Karşılaştırma: Viking Fourtech vs. Ceat WinterDrive vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ vs. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

Bütçe

Viking

Fourtech

R13 – R19

VS

Ceat

Ayrıca karşılaştır

PILOT ALPIN 5

WinterContact TS 870

UltraGrip Performance 3

Test profili

Fourtech

WinterDrive

UltraGrip Performance+

WinterCraft WP52+

Test sayısı

5

4

23

3

En iyi sıralama

#11

#10

#1

#4

Ortalama sıralama

17.0

3.3

4.3

En son test

2021

2025

Mevcut ebatlar

32

37

176

97

Islak zeminde yol tutuşu

Viking Fourtech

70%

Ceat WinterDrive

27%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

83%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

79%

ıslak zemin frenleme

Viking Fourtech

71%

Ceat WinterDrive

25%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

80%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

84%

ıslak zemin viraj performansı

Viking Fourtech

55%

Ceat WinterDrive

55%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

82%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

81%

ıslak zemin yol tutuşu

Viking Fourtech

59%

Ceat WinterDrive

51%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

89%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

86%

Suda kızaklama-çapraz

Viking Fourtech

96%

Ceat WinterDrive

9%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

87%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

66%

Suda kızaklama-boyuna

Viking Fourtech

77%

Ceat WinterDrive

2%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

83%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

72%

Karlı zeminde yol tutuşlu

Viking Fourtech

71%

Ceat WinterDrive

54%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

91%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

81%

Karlı zemin frenleme

Viking Fourtech

82%

Ceat WinterDrive

39%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

89%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

80%

Karlı zemin viraj performansı

Viking Fourtech

67%

Ceat WinterDrive

71%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

88%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

78%

Karlı zemin yol tutuşu

Viking Fourtech

71%

Ceat WinterDrive

71%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

89%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

86%

Karda çekiş

Viking Fourtech

51%

Ceat WinterDrive

35%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

91%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

76%

Maliyetler

Viking Fourtech

84%

Ceat WinterDrive

70%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

80%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

71%

Yuvarlanma direnci

Viking Fourtech

96%

Ceat WinterDrive

65%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

80%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

69%

Kullanım ömrü

Viking Fourtech

65%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

78%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

69%

Fiyat değer oranı

Viking Fourtech

77%

Ceat WinterDrive

92%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

69%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

84%

Konfor

Viking Fourtech

76%

Ceat WinterDrive

78%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

84%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

72%

Konfor

Viking Fourtech

66%

Ceat WinterDrive

78%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

79%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

68%

Harici gürültü

Viking Fourtech

76%

Ceat WinterDrive

78%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

81%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

72%

Kuru zeminde yol tutuşu

Viking Fourtech

59%

Ceat WinterDrive

73%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

78%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

78%

Kuru zemin frenleme

Viking Fourtech

47%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

84%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

84%

Kuru yol tutuşu - ölçümlenen

Viking Fourtech

71%

Ceat WinterDrive

73%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

81%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

72%

Boyutlar ve fi̇yatlar

Bu lastiklerin tüm mevcut ebatlarındaki fiyatları karşılaştırın.

Karşılaştırma: Viking Fourtech vs. Ceat WinterDrive vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ vs. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

Fourtech

WinterDrive

UltraGrip Performance+

WinterCraft WP52+

Test profili

Islak zeminde yol tutuşu

Karlı zeminde yol tutuşlu

Maliyetler

Konfor

Kuru zeminde yol tutuşu

Boyutlar ve fi̇yatlar

Karşılaştırmaya ekle