Karşılaştırma: Viking Fourtech vs. Ceat WinterDrive vs. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

Budget

Viking

Fourtech

R13 – R19

VS

Ceat

Also compare with

PILOT ALPIN 5

WinterContact TS 870

UltraGrip Performance 3

Test profile

Fourtech

WinterDrive

WinterCraft WP52+

UltraGrip Performance+

Test sayısı

5

4

3

23

Best position

#11

#10

#4

#1

Average position

17.0

4.3

3.3

En son test

2021

2025

Mevcut ebatlar

32

37

97

176

Islak zeminde yol tutuşu

Viking Fourtech

70%

Ceat WinterDrive

27%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

79%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

83%

ıslak zemin frenleme

Viking Fourtech

71%

Ceat WinterDrive

25%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

84%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

80%

ıslak zemin viraj performansı

Viking Fourtech

55%

Ceat WinterDrive

55%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

81%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

82%

ıslak zemin yol tutuşu

Viking Fourtech

59%

Ceat WinterDrive

51%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

86%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

89%

Suda kızaklama-çapraz

Viking Fourtech

96%

Ceat WinterDrive

9%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

66%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

87%

Suda kızaklama-boyuna

Viking Fourtech

77%

Ceat WinterDrive

2%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

72%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

83%

Karlı zeminde yol tutuşlu

Viking Fourtech

71%

Ceat WinterDrive

54%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

81%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

91%

Karda çekiş

Viking Fourtech

51%

Ceat WinterDrive

35%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

76%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

91%

Karlı zemin frenleme

Viking Fourtech

82%

Ceat WinterDrive

39%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

80%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

89%

Karlı zemin viraj performansı

Viking Fourtech

67%

Ceat WinterDrive

71%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

78%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

88%

Karlı zemin yol tutuşu

Viking Fourtech

71%

Ceat WinterDrive

71%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

86%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

89%

Maliyetler

Viking Fourtech

84%

Ceat WinterDrive

70%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

71%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

80%

Yuvarlanma direnci

Viking Fourtech

96%

Ceat WinterDrive

65%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

69%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

80%

Kullanım ömrü

Viking Fourtech

65%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

69%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

78%

Fiyat değer oranı

Viking Fourtech

77%

Ceat WinterDrive

92%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

84%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

69%

Konfor

Viking Fourtech

76%

Ceat WinterDrive

78%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

72%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

84%

Konfor

Viking Fourtech

66%

Ceat WinterDrive

78%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

68%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

79%

Harici gürültü

Viking Fourtech

76%

Ceat WinterDrive

78%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

72%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

81%

Kuru zeminde yol tutuşu

Viking Fourtech

59%

Ceat WinterDrive

73%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

78%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

78%

Kuru zemin frenleme

Viking Fourtech

47%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

84%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

84%

Kuru yol tutuşu - ölçümlenen

Viking Fourtech

71%

Ceat WinterDrive

73%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

72%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

81%

Boyutlar ve fi̇yatlar

Bu lastiklerin tüm mevcut ebatlarındaki fiyatları karşılaştırın.

Karşılaştırma: Viking Fourtech vs. Ceat WinterDrive vs. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

Fourtech

WinterDrive

WinterCraft WP52+

UltraGrip Performance+

Test profile

Islak zeminde yol tutuşu

Karlı zeminde yol tutuşlu

Maliyetler

Konfor

Kuru zeminde yol tutuşu

Boyutlar ve fi̇yatlar

Karşılaştırmaya ekle