Karşılaştırma: Viking Fourtech vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Michelin CrossClimate 2 vs. Continental PremiumContact 7

Budget

Viking

Fourtech

R13 – R19

VS

Premium

GoodYear

Also compare with

Ventus Evo

Pilot Sport 5

UltraContact NXT

Test profile

Fourtech

Efficientgrip Performance 2

CrossClimate 2

PremiumContact 7

Test sayısı

5

3

24

26

Best position

#11

#2

#1

Average position

17.0

3.3

2.7

2.2

En son test

2021

2026

2025

2026

Mevcut ebatlar

32

40

150

66

Islak zeminde yol tutuşu

Viking Fourtech

70%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

72%

Continental PremiumContact 7

90%

Suda kızaklama-boyuna

Viking Fourtech

77%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

79%

Continental PremiumContact 7

75%

ıslak zemin frenleme

Viking Fourtech

71%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

75%

Continental PremiumContact 7

94%

ıslak zemin viraj performansı

Viking Fourtech

55%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

77%

Continental PremiumContact 7

92%

ıslak zemin yol tutuşu

Viking Fourtech

59%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

74%

Continental PremiumContact 7

90%

Suda kızaklama-çapraz

Viking Fourtech

96%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

75%

Continental PremiumContact 7

76%

Karlı zeminde yol tutuşlu

Viking Fourtech

71%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

92%

Karda çekiş

Viking Fourtech

51%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

92%

Karlı zemin frenleme

Viking Fourtech

82%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

90%

Karlı zemin viraj performansı

Viking Fourtech

67%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

93%

Karlı zemin yol tutuşu

Viking Fourtech

71%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

92%

Maliyetler

Viking Fourtech

84%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

78%

Continental PremiumContact 7

76%

Yuvarlanma direnci

Viking Fourtech

96%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

72%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

87%

Continental PremiumContact 7

75%

Kullanım ömrü

Viking Fourtech

65%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

74%

Continental PremiumContact 7

81%

Fiyat değer oranı

Viking Fourtech

77%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

43%

Continental PremiumContact 7

77%

Konfor

Viking Fourtech

76%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

73%

Continental PremiumContact 7

76%

Konfor

Viking Fourtech

66%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

90%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

83%

Harici gürültü

Viking Fourtech

76%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

84%

Continental PremiumContact 7

69%

Kuru zeminde yol tutuşu

Viking Fourtech

59%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

87%

Continental PremiumContact 7

90%

Kuru zemin frenleme

Viking Fourtech

47%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

92%

Continental PremiumContact 7

90%

Kuru yol tutuşu - ölçümlenen

Viking Fourtech

71%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

82%

Continental PremiumContact 7

85%

Boyutlar ve fi̇yatlar

Bu lastiklerin tüm mevcut ebatlarındaki fiyatları karşılaştırın.

Karşılaştırma: Viking Fourtech vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Michelin CrossClimate 2 vs. Continental PremiumContact 7

Fourtech

Efficientgrip Performance 2

CrossClimate 2

PremiumContact 7

Test profile

Islak zeminde yol tutuşu

Karlı zeminde yol tutuşlu

Maliyetler

Konfor

Kuru zeminde yol tutuşu

Boyutlar ve fi̇yatlar

Karşılaştırmaya ekle