Karşılaştırma: Viking Fourtech vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Michelin CrossClimate 2 vs. Hankook ION FlexClimate

Budget

Viking

Fourtech

R13 – R19

VS

Premium

GoodYear

Also compare with

PremiumContact 7

UltraContact NXT

Cinturato All Season SF3

Test profile

Fourtech

Efficientgrip Performance 2

CrossClimate 2

ION FlexClimate

Test sayısı

5

3

24

1

Best position

#11

#2

#1

Average position

17.0

3.3

2.7

1.0

En son test

2021

2026

2025

Mevcut ebatlar

32

40

151

27

Islak zeminde yol tutuşu

Viking Fourtech

70%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

72%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

90%

ıslak zemin viraj performansı

Viking Fourtech

55%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

77%

ıslak zemin yol tutuşu

Viking Fourtech

59%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

74%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

84%

Suda kızaklama-çapraz

Viking Fourtech

96%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

75%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

90%

Suda kızaklama-boyuna

Viking Fourtech

77%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

79%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

95%

ıslak zemin frenleme

Viking Fourtech

71%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

75%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

90%

Karlı zeminde yol tutuşlu

Viking Fourtech

71%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

92%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

75%

Karlı zemin frenleme

Viking Fourtech

82%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

90%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

78%

Karlı zemin viraj performansı

Viking Fourtech

67%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

93%

Karlı zemin yol tutuşu

Viking Fourtech

71%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

92%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

71%

Karda çekiş

Viking Fourtech

51%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

92%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

76%

Maliyetler

Viking Fourtech

84%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

78%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

84%

Kullanım ömrü

Viking Fourtech

65%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

74%

Fiyat değer oranı

Viking Fourtech

77%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

43%

Yuvarlanma direnci

Viking Fourtech

96%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

72%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

87%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

84%

Konfor

Viking Fourtech

76%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

73%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

78%

Harici gürültü

Viking Fourtech

76%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

84%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

81%

Konfor

Viking Fourtech

66%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

90%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

83%

Kuru zeminde yol tutuşu

Viking Fourtech

59%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

87%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

90%

Kuru zemin frenleme

Viking Fourtech

47%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

92%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

90%

Kuru yol tutuşu - ölçümlenen

Viking Fourtech

71%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

82%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

90%

Boyutlar ve fi̇yatlar

Bu lastiklerin tüm mevcut ebatlarındaki fiyatları karşılaştırın.

Karşılaştırma: Viking Fourtech vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Michelin CrossClimate 2 vs. Hankook ION FlexClimate

Fourtech

Efficientgrip Performance 2

CrossClimate 2

ION FlexClimate

Test profile

Islak zeminde yol tutuşu

Karlı zeminde yol tutuşlu

Maliyetler

Konfor

Kuru zeminde yol tutuşu

Boyutlar ve fi̇yatlar

Karşılaştırmaya ekle