Karşılaştırma: Viking Fourtech vs. Viking WinTech vs. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

Budget

Viking

Fourtech

R13 – R19

VS

Budget

Viking

Also compare with

PILOT ALPIN 5

WinterContact TS 870

UltraGrip Performance 3

Test profile

Fourtech

WinTech

Blizzak LM-005

UltraGrip Performance+

Test sayısı

5

6

49

23

Best position

#11

#1

Average position

17.0

20.8

3.2

3.3

En son test

2021

2024

2025

Mevcut ebatlar

32

59

213

176

Islak zeminde yol tutuşu

Viking Fourtech

70%

Viking WinTech

55%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

90%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

83%

ıslak zemin viraj performansı

Viking Fourtech

55%

Viking WinTech

62%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

90%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

82%

ıslak zemin yol tutuşu

Viking Fourtech

59%

Viking WinTech

52%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

93%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

89%

Suda kızaklama-çapraz

Viking Fourtech

96%

Viking WinTech

46%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

84%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

87%

Suda kızaklama-boyuna

Viking Fourtech

77%

Viking WinTech

52%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

86%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

83%

ıslak zemin frenleme

Viking Fourtech

71%

Viking WinTech

61%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

95%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

80%

Karlı zeminde yol tutuşlu

Viking Fourtech

71%

Viking WinTech

62%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

78%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

91%

Karlı zemin frenleme

Viking Fourtech

82%

Viking WinTech

71%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

86%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

89%

Karlı zemin viraj performansı

Viking Fourtech

67%

Viking WinTech

65%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

77%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

88%

Karlı zemin yol tutuşu

Viking Fourtech

71%

Viking WinTech

47%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

72%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

89%

Karda çekiş

Viking Fourtech

51%

Viking WinTech

73%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

82%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

91%

Maliyetler

Viking Fourtech

84%

Viking WinTech

72%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

78%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

80%

Yuvarlanma direnci

Viking Fourtech

96%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

87%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

80%

Kullanım ömrü

Viking Fourtech

65%

Viking WinTech

67%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

64%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

78%

Fiyat değer oranı

Viking Fourtech

77%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

60%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

69%

Kuru zeminde yol tutuşu

Viking Fourtech

59%

Viking WinTech

63%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

82%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

78%

Kuru yol tutuşu - ölçümlenen

Viking Fourtech

71%

Viking WinTech

59%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

89%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

81%

Kuru zemin frenleme

Viking Fourtech

47%

Viking WinTech

62%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

81%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

84%

Konfor

Viking Fourtech

76%

Viking WinTech

66%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

81%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

84%

Harici gürültü

Viking Fourtech

76%

Viking WinTech

61%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

79%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

81%

Konfor

Viking Fourtech

66%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

82%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

79%

Boyutlar ve fi̇yatlar

Bu lastiklerin tüm mevcut ebatlarındaki fiyatları karşılaştırın.

Karşılaştırma: Viking Fourtech vs. Viking WinTech vs. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

Fourtech

WinTech

Blizzak LM-005

UltraGrip Performance+

Test profile

Islak zeminde yol tutuşu

Karlı zeminde yol tutuşlu

Maliyetler

Kuru zeminde yol tutuşu

Konfor

Boyutlar ve fi̇yatlar

Karşılaştırmaya ekle