Karşılaştırma: Firestone Multihawk 2 vs. Petlas Imperium PT515 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

1. Hankook ION Evo Premium

2. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 Premium

3. Firestone Multihawk 2 üst-orta

4. Falken e.Ziex üst-orta

5. Petlas Imperium PT515 Düşük maliyet

1. Hankook ION Evo 64

2. Firestone Multihawk 2 59

3. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 47

4. Falken e.Ziex 34

5. Petlas Imperium PT515 11

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 18x

2. Petlas Imperium PT515 5x

3. Falken e.Ziex 3x

4. Firestone Multihawk 2 1x

5. Hankook ION Evo 1x

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 1.

2. Hankook ION Evo 1.

3. Falken e.Ziex 2.

4. Firestone Multihawk 2 12.

5. Petlas Imperium PT515 13.

1. Hankook ION Evo 1.

2. Falken e.Ziex 5.

3. Firestone Multihawk 2 12.

4. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 18.

5. Petlas Imperium PT515 35.

1. Hankook ION Evo 1

2. Falken e.Ziex 3.67

3. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 6.11

4. Firestone Multihawk 2 12

5. Petlas Imperium PT515 24

1. Falken e.Ziex 2025

2. Hankook ION Evo 2025

3. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 2024

4. Petlas Imperium PT515 2021

5. Firestone Multihawk 2 2018

1. Falken e.Ziex çok iyi

2. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 örnek

3. Hankook ION Evo örnek

4. Petlas Imperium PT515 Iyi

5. Firestone Multihawk 2 Memnun edici

1. Falken e.Ziex Iyi

2. Firestone Multihawk 2 Memnun edici

3. Petlas Imperium PT515 Memnun edici

4. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 Memnun edici

5. Hankook ION Evo ?

Hankook
ION Evo

89%

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2

76%

Falken
e.Ziex

72%

Firestone
Multihawk 2

64%

Petlas
Imperium PT515

56%

1. Hankook ION Evo 97%

2. Falken e.Ziex 87%

3. Firestone Multihawk 2 74%

4. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 72%

5. Petlas Imperium PT515 55%

1. Hankook ION Evo 92%

2. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 89%

3. Falken e.Ziex 77%

4. Firestone Multihawk 2 61%

5. Petlas Imperium PT515 60%

1. Hankook ION Evo 87%

2. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 73%

3. Petlas Imperium PT515 66%

4. Firestone Multihawk 2 61%

5. Falken e.Ziex 61%

1. Hankook ION Evo 92%

2. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 75%

3. Falken e.Ziex 69%

4. Firestone Multihawk 2 50%

5. Petlas Imperium PT515 30%

1. Hankook ION Evo 77%

2. Firestone Multihawk 2 72%

3. Petlas Imperium PT515 71%

4. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 69%

5. Falken e.Ziex 68%

1. Hankook ION Evo A

2. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 A

3. Firestone Multihawk 2 C

4. Petlas Imperium PT515 ?

5. Falken e.Ziex ?

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2

100%

Hankook
ION Evo

82%

Firestone
Multihawk 2

74%

Petlas
Imperium PT515

70%

Falken
e.Ziex

60%

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 100%

2. Hankook ION Evo 82%

3. Petlas Imperium PT515 75%

4. Firestone Multihawk 2 72%

5. Falken e.Ziex 60%

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 B

2. Hankook ION Evo B

3. Firestone Multihawk 2 E

4. Petlas Imperium PT515 ?

5. Falken e.Ziex ?

Falken
e.Ziex

78%

Petlas
Imperium PT515

75%

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2

73%

Firestone
Multihawk 2

72%

Hankook
ION Evo

66%

1. Falken e.Ziex 78%

2. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 75%

3. Petlas Imperium PT515 70%

4. Hankook ION Evo 66%

5. Firestone Multihawk 2 54%

1. Falken e.Ziex ?

2. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 ?

3. Petlas Imperium PT515 ?

4. Hankook ION Evo ?

5. Firestone Multihawk 2 ?

Firestone
Multihawk 2

97%

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2

93%

Hankook
ION Evo

91.5%

Falken
e.Ziex

84.9%

Petlas
Imperium PT515

48%