Karşılaştırma: GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. BFGoodrich Advantage vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Falken e.Ziex

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 Premium

2. BFGoodrich Advantage üst-orta

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 üst-orta

4. Falken e.Ziex üst-orta

1. BFGoodrich Advantage 146

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 104

3. Falken e.Ziex 34

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 23

1. BFGoodrich Advantage 13x

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 9x

3. Falken e.Ziex 3x

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 2x

1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 2.

2. Falken e.Ziex 2.

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 2.

4. BFGoodrich Advantage 8.

1. Falken e.Ziex 5.

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 5.

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 13.

4. BFGoodrich Advantage 24.

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 3.5

2. Falken e.Ziex 3.67

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 5.67

4. BFGoodrich Advantage 13.62

1. BFGoodrich Advantage 2025

2. Falken e.Ziex 2025

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 2025

4. Kumho Ecsta HS52 2024

1. Falken e.Ziex çok iyi

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 çok iyi

3. BFGoodrich Advantage Iyi

4. Kumho Ecsta HS52 Iyi

1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 Iyi

2. Falken e.Ziex Iyi

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 Tavsiye edilir

4. BFGoodrich Advantage Yeterli

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2

76%

Kumho
Ecsta HS52

74%

Falken
e.Ziex

73%

BFGoodrich
Advantage

63%

1. Falken e.Ziex 87%

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 80%

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 78%

4. BFGoodrich Advantage 77%

1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 79%

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 74%

3. Falken e.Ziex 69%

4. BFGoodrich Advantage 57%

1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 73%

2. Falken e.Ziex 68%

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 66%

4. BFGoodrich Advantage 61%

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 69%

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 66%

3. Falken e.Ziex 61%

4. BFGoodrich Advantage 53%

1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 89%

2. Falken e.Ziex 77%

3. BFGoodrich Advantage 69%

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 61%

1. BFGoodrich Advantage 79%

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 75%

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 55%

4. Falken e.Ziex 0%

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 100%

2. Falken e.Ziex 73%

3. BFGoodrich Advantage 54%

4. Kumho Ecsta HS52 0%

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 A

2. BFGoodrich Advantage A

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 A

4. Falken e.Ziex ?

Falken
e.Ziex

83%

Kumho
Ecsta HS52

82%

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2

73%

BFGoodrich
Advantage

72%

1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 89%

2. Falken e.Ziex 88%

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 77%

4. BFGoodrich Advantage 76%

1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 85%

2. Falken e.Ziex 81%

3. BFGoodrich Advantage 80%

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 77%

1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 72%

2. BFGoodrich Advantage 70%

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 64%

4. Falken e.Ziex 0%

1. Falken e.Ziex 87%

2. BFGoodrich Advantage 77%

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 75%

4. Kumho Ecsta HS52 0%

Falken
e.Ziex

78%

BFGoodrich
Advantage

78%

Kumho
Ecsta HS52

77%

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

1. Falken e.Ziex 78%

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 73%

3. BFGoodrich Advantage 68%

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 67%

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 90%

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 76%

3. BFGoodrich Advantage 72%

4. Falken e.Ziex 0%

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 ?

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 ?

3. Falken e.Ziex ?

4. BFGoodrich Advantage ? dB

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2

88%

Falken
e.Ziex

78%

Kumho
Ecsta HS52

74%

BFGoodrich
Advantage

74%

1. Falken e.Ziex 95%

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 72%

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 70%

4. BFGoodrich Advantage 66%

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 99%

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 79%

3. BFGoodrich Advantage 63%

4. Falken e.Ziex 60%

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 B

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 C

3. BFGoodrich Advantage C

4. Falken e.Ziex ?