Karşılaştırma: Nokian WR C3 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Hankook ION Evo

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 Premium

2. Hankook ION Evo Premium

3. Nokian WR C3 üst-orta

4. Falken e.Ziex üst-orta

1. Hankook ION Evo 64

2. Falken e.Ziex 34

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 23

4. Nokian WR C3 23

1. Falken e.Ziex 3x

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 2x

3. Hankook ION Evo 1x

4. Nokian WR C3 1x

1. Hankook ION Evo 1.

2. Falken e.Ziex 2.

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 2.

4. Nokian WR C3 7.

1. Hankook ION Evo 1.

2. Falken e.Ziex 5.

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 5.

4. Nokian WR C3 7.

1. Hankook ION Evo 1

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 3.5

3. Falken e.Ziex 3.67

4. Nokian WR C3 7

1. Falken e.Ziex 2025

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 2025

3. Hankook ION Evo 2025

4. Nokian WR C3 2018

1. Falken e.Ziex çok iyi

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 çok iyi

3. Hankook ION Evo örnek

4. Nokian WR C3 Duruma göre tavsiye edilir

1. Falken e.Ziex Iyi

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 Tavsiye edilir

3. Nokian WR C3 Duruma göre tavsiye edilir

4. Hankook ION Evo ?

Hankook
ION Evo

89%

Falken
e.Ziex

73%

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2

73%

Nokian
WR C3

30%

1. Hankook ION Evo 97%

2. Falken e.Ziex 87%

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 78%

4. Nokian WR C3 25%

1. Hankook ION Evo 87%

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 69%

3. Falken e.Ziex 61%

4. Nokian WR C3 25%

1. Hankook ION Evo 92%

2. Falken e.Ziex 77%

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 61%

4. Nokian WR C3 33%

1. Hankook ION Evo 77%

2. Falken e.Ziex 68%

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 66%

4. Nokian WR C3 33%

1. Hankook ION Evo 92%

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 74%

3. Falken e.Ziex 69%

4. Nokian WR C3 33%

1. Hankook ION Evo A

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 A

3. Nokian WR C3 E

4. Falken e.Ziex ?

Hankook
ION Evo

92%

Falken
e.Ziex

83%

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Nokian
WR C3

61%

1. Hankook ION Evo 92%

2. Falken e.Ziex 81%

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 77%

4. Nokian WR C3 53%

1. Hankook ION Evo 91%

2. Falken e.Ziex 88%

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 77%

4. Nokian WR C3 62%

Nokian
WR C3

97%

Hankook
ION Evo

?

Falken
e.Ziex

?

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2

?

Falken
e.Ziex

78%

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Nokian
WR C3

66%

Hankook
ION Evo

66%

1. Nokian WR C3 81%

2. Falken e.Ziex 78%

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 67%

4. Hankook ION Evo 66%

1. Nokian WR C3 ?

2. Falken e.Ziex ?

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 ?

4. Hankook ION Evo ?

Falken
e.Ziex

95%

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2

72%

Hankook
ION Evo

69%

Nokian
WR C3

43%

1. Falken e.Ziex 95%

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 72%

3. Hankook ION Evo 69%

4. Nokian WR C3 43%

1. Hankook ION Evo A

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 B

3. Nokian WR C3 C

4. Falken e.Ziex ?