Karşılaştırma: Nokian WR C3 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 Premium

2. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance Premium

3. Nokian WR C3 üst-orta

4. Kumho Ecsta HS52 üst-orta

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 153

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 104

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 23

4. Nokian WR C3 23

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 16x

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 9x

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 2x

4. Nokian WR C3 1x

1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 2.

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 2.

3. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 3.

4. Nokian WR C3 7.

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 5.

2. Nokian WR C3 7.

3. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 12.

4. Kumho Ecsta HS52 13.

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 3.5

2. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 5.5

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 5.67

4. Nokian WR C3 7

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 2025

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 2024

3. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2023

4. Nokian WR C3 2018

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 çok iyi

2. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance örnek

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 Iyi

4. Nokian WR C3 Duruma göre tavsiye edilir

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance Iyi

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 Iyi

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 Tavsiye edilir

4. Nokian WR C3 Duruma göre tavsiye edilir

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance

84%

Kumho
Ecsta HS52

77%

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2

73%

Nokian
WR C3

30%

1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 80%

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 78%

3. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 76%

4. Nokian WR C3 25%

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 89%

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 69%

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 66%

4. Nokian WR C3 25%

1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 89%

2. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 81%

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 61%

4. Nokian WR C3 33%

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 86%

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 73%

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 66%

4. Nokian WR C3 33%

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 87%

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 79%

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 74%

4. Nokian WR C3 33%

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance A

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 A

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 A

4. Nokian WR C3 E

Nokian
WR C3

97%

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance

?

Kumho
Ecsta HS52

?

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2

?

Kumho
Ecsta HS52

87%

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance

80%

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Nokian
WR C3

61%

1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 89%

2. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 83%

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 77%

4. Nokian WR C3 62%

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 93%

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 85%

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 77%

4. Nokian WR C3 53%

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance

74%

Kumho
Ecsta HS52

72%

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Nokian
WR C3

66%

1. Nokian WR C3 81%

2. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 75%

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 73%

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 67%

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 73%

2. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 73%

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 71%

4. Nokian WR C3 50%

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 69 dB

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 ?

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 ?

4. Nokian WR C3 ?

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance

86%

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2

72%

Kumho
Ecsta HS52

70%

Nokian
WR C3

43%

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 86%

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 72%

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 70%

4. Nokian WR C3 43%

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance B

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 B

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 C

4. Nokian WR C3 C