Karşılaştırma: Nokian WR C3 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Michelin Primacy 5 vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 Premium

2. Michelin Primacy 5 Premium

3. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 Premium

4. Nokian WR C3 üst-orta

1. Michelin Primacy 5 126

2. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 47

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 23

4. Nokian WR C3 23

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 18x

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 3x

3. Michelin Primacy 5 3x

4. Nokian WR C3 1x

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 1.

2. Michelin Primacy 5 1.

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 2.

4. Nokian WR C3 7.

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 5.

2. Michelin Primacy 5 7.

3. Nokian WR C3 7.

4. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 18.

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 3.33

2. Michelin Primacy 5 4.67

3. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 6.11

4. Nokian WR C3 7

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 2026

2. Michelin Primacy 5 2026

3. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 2024

4. Nokian WR C3 2018

1. Michelin Primacy 5 Test kazananı

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 çok iyi

3. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 örnek

4. Nokian WR C3 Duruma göre tavsiye edilir

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 Memnun edici

2. Michelin Primacy 5 Memnun edici

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 Tavsiye edilir

4. Nokian WR C3 Duruma göre tavsiye edilir

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2

77%

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2

73%

Michelin
Primacy 5

58%

Nokian
WR C3

30%

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 78%

2. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 72%

3. Michelin Primacy 5 65%

4. Nokian WR C3 25%

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 73%

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 69%

3. Nokian WR C3 25%

4. Michelin Primacy 5 0%

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 89%

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 61%

3. Nokian WR C3 33%

4. Michelin Primacy 5 0%

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 69%

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 66%

3. Michelin Primacy 5 51%

4. Nokian WR C3 33%

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 75%

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 74%

3. Nokian WR C3 33%

4. Michelin Primacy 5 0%

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 A

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 A

3. Michelin Primacy 5 A

4. Nokian WR C3 E

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2

77%

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Michelin
Primacy 5

73%

Nokian
WR C3

61%

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 77%

2. Michelin Primacy 5 76%

3. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 73%

4. Nokian WR C3 62%

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 77%

2. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 73%

3. Michelin Primacy 5 69%

4. Nokian WR C3 53%

Nokian
WR C3

97%

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2

?

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2

?

Michelin
Primacy 5

?

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2

73%

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Nokian
WR C3

66%

Michelin
Primacy 5

1%

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 73%

2. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 71%

3. Nokian WR C3 50%

4. Michelin Primacy 5 1%

1. Nokian WR C3 81%

2. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 75%

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 67%

4. Michelin Primacy 5 0%

1. Nokian WR C3 ?

2. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 ?

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 ?

4. Michelin Primacy 5 ?

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2

84%

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2

72%

Michelin
Primacy 5

63%

Nokian
WR C3

43%

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 84%

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 72%

3. Michelin Primacy 5 63%

4. Nokian WR C3 43%

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 B

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 B

3. Michelin Primacy 5 B

4. Nokian WR C3 C