Karşılaştırma: Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Hankook ION Evo

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 Premium

2. Hankook ION Evo Premium

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 üst-orta

4. Falken e.Ziex üst-orta

1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 104

2. Hankook ION Evo 64

3. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 47

4. Falken e.Ziex 34

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 18x

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 9x

3. Falken e.Ziex 3x

4. Hankook ION Evo 1x

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 1.

2. Hankook ION Evo 1.

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 2.

4. Falken e.Ziex 2.

1. Hankook ION Evo 1.

2. Falken e.Ziex 5.

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 13.

4. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 18.

1. Hankook ION Evo 1

2. Falken e.Ziex 3.67

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 5.67

4. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 6.11

1. Falken e.Ziex 2025

2. Hankook ION Evo 2025

3. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 2024

4. Kumho Ecsta HS52 2024

1. Falken e.Ziex çok iyi

2. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 örnek

3. Hankook ION Evo örnek

4. Kumho Ecsta HS52 Iyi

1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 Iyi

2. Falken e.Ziex Iyi

3. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 Memnun edici

4. Hankook ION Evo ?

Hankook
ION Evo

89%

Kumho
Ecsta HS52

77%

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2

76%

Falken
e.Ziex

72%

1. Hankook ION Evo 87%

2. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 73%

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 66%

4. Falken e.Ziex 61%

1. Hankook ION Evo 77%

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 73%

3. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 69%

4. Falken e.Ziex 68%

1. Hankook ION Evo 97%

2. Falken e.Ziex 87%

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 80%

4. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 72%

1. Hankook ION Evo 92%

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 89%

3. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 89%

4. Falken e.Ziex 77%

1. Hankook ION Evo 92%

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 79%

3. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 75%

4. Falken e.Ziex 69%

1. Hankook ION Evo A

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 A

3. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 A

4. Falken e.Ziex ?

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2

79%

Falken
e.Ziex

78%

Kumho
Ecsta HS52

77%

Hankook
ION Evo

72%

1. Falken e.Ziex 78%

2. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 75%

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 73%

4. Hankook ION Evo 66%

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 90%

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 76%

3. Falken e.Ziex 0%

4. Hankook ION Evo 0%

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 ?

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 ?

3. Falken e.Ziex ?

4. Hankook ION Evo ?

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2

93%

Kumho
Ecsta HS52

82%

Falken
e.Ziex

72%

Hankook
ION Evo

70%

1. Falken e.Ziex 95%

2. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 84%

3. Hankook ION Evo 69%

4. Kumho Ecsta HS52 70%

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 100%

2. Hankook ION Evo 82%

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 79%

4. Falken e.Ziex 60%

1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 97%

2. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 97%

3. Hankook ION Evo 60%

4. Falken e.Ziex 60%

1. Hankook ION Evo A

2. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 B

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 C

4. Falken e.Ziex ?

Hankook
ION Evo

92%

Kumho
Ecsta HS52

87%

Falken
e.Ziex

84%

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2

73%

1. Hankook ION Evo 91%

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 89%

3. Falken e.Ziex 88%

4. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 73%

1. Hankook ION Evo 92%

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 85%

3. Falken e.Ziex 81%

4. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 73%