Karşılaştırma: GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Kumho Ecsta PS71 vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. Hankook ION Evo

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 Premium

2. Michelin e.Primacy Premium

3. Hankook ION Evo Premium

4. Kumho Ecsta PS71 üst-orta

1. Kumho Ecsta PS71 224

2. Michelin e.Primacy 111

3. Hankook ION Evo 64

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 23

1. Kumho Ecsta PS71 15x

2. Michelin e.Primacy 4x

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 2x

4. Hankook ION Evo 1x

1. Hankook ION Evo 1.

2. Kumho Ecsta PS71 2.

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 2.

4. Michelin e.Primacy 3.

1. Hankook ION Evo 1.

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 5.

3. Kumho Ecsta PS71 20.

4. Michelin e.Primacy 38.

1. Hankook ION Evo 1

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 3.5

3. Kumho Ecsta PS71 9

4. Michelin e.Primacy 12

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 2025

2. Hankook ION Evo 2025

3. Kumho Ecsta PS71 2025

4. Michelin e.Primacy 2025

1. Michelin e.Primacy çok iyi

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 çok iyi

3. Hankook ION Evo örnek

4. Kumho Ecsta PS71 şiddetle tavsiye edilir

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 Tavsiye edilir

2. Kumho Ecsta PS71 Duruma göre tavsiye edilir

3. Michelin e.Primacy Yeterli

4. Hankook ION Evo ?

Hankook
ION Evo

89%

Kumho
Ecsta PS71

79%

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Michelin
e.Primacy

62%

1. Hankook ION Evo 97%

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 78%

3. Kumho Ecsta PS71 79%

4. Michelin e.Primacy 62%

1. Hankook ION Evo 92%

2. Kumho Ecsta PS71 79%

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 74%

4. Michelin e.Primacy 52%

1. Kumho Ecsta PS71 90%

2. Hankook ION Evo 77%

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 66%

4. Michelin e.Primacy 65%

1. Hankook ION Evo 87%

2. Kumho Ecsta PS71 87%

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 69%

4. Michelin e.Primacy 65%

1. Hankook ION Evo 92%

2. Kumho Ecsta PS71 72%

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 61%

4. Michelin e.Primacy 52%

1. Hankook ION Evo A

2. Kumho Ecsta PS71 A

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 A

4. Michelin e.Primacy B

Hankook
ION Evo

92%

Michelin
e.Primacy

78%

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Kumho
Ecsta PS71

70%

1. Hankook ION Evo 91%

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 77%

3. Kumho Ecsta PS71 76%

4. Michelin e.Primacy 63%

1. Hankook ION Evo 92%

2. Kumho Ecsta PS71 81%

3. Michelin e.Primacy 80%

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 77%

1. Kumho Ecsta PS71 67%

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 65%

3. Hankook ION Evo 0%

4. Michelin e.Primacy 0%

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Hankook
ION Evo

72%

Kumho
Ecsta PS71

67%

Michelin
e.Primacy

65%

1. Michelin e.Primacy 70%

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 67%

3. Hankook ION Evo 66%

4. Kumho Ecsta PS71 62%

1. Hankook ION Evo 78%

2. Kumho Ecsta PS71 72%

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 59%

4. Michelin e.Primacy 54%

1. Hankook ION Evo ?

2. Kumho Ecsta PS71 ?

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 ?

4. Michelin e.Primacy ?

Michelin
e.Primacy

89%

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2

88%

Hankook
ION Evo

76%

Kumho
Ecsta PS71

74%

1. Kumho Ecsta PS71 73%

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 72%

3. Hankook ION Evo 69%

4. Michelin e.Primacy 67%

1. Michelin e.Primacy 100%

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 99%

3. Hankook ION Evo 82%

4. Kumho Ecsta PS71 65%

1. Michelin e.Primacy 100%

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 94%

3. Kumho Ecsta PS71 83%

4. Hankook ION Evo 0%

1. Michelin e.Primacy A

2. Hankook ION Evo A

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 B

4. Kumho Ecsta PS71 C